Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 LP and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 LP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (28W vs 238W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
432 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380 LP
0.044 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050 +2236%
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2009
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
2
SM Count
14
16
Shading Units
448
8
TMUs
56
4
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

2.200 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
4.400 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
44.00 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

28W
TDP
238W
200 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort
Outputs
1x DVI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT218
GPU Name
GF100
GT218 GL
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.26 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
57 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
2.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy