Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 380 and 48GB VRAM Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 380 's Advantages
Lower TDP (34W vs 295W)
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock2495MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (864.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
6128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 380
0.035 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 440 PCIe x16 +175100%
61.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Apr 2023
Quadro FX
Generation
Radeon Pro Navi
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1855 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2495 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

256MB
Memory Size
48GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
864.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
96
2
SM Count
-
16
Shading Units
6144
8
TMUs
384
8
ROPs
192
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
96
-
L1 Cache
256 KB per Array
32 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
L3 Cache
96 MB

Theoretical Performance

3.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
479.0 GPixel/s
3.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
958.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
122.6 TFLOPS
35.20 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
61.32 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
1.916 TFLOPS

Board Design

34W
TDP
295W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI
Outputs
3x DisplayPort 2.1 1x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
None
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G96
GPU Name
Navi 31
-
GPU Variant
Navi 31
Tesla
Architecture
RDNA 3.0
UMC
Foundry
TSMC
65 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.314 billion
Transistors
57.7 billion
144 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
2.2
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy