Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Quadro M500M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Quadro M500M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 and 2GB VRAM Quadro M500M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro M500M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (30W vs 108W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro M500M +86%
0.863 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1029 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1124 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
16
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SMM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.992 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
17.98 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
863.2 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
26.98 GFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
30W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GM108
G200-835-B2
GPU Variant
N15M-Q3
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
Unknown
470 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
5.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy