Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 135M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 9.504GB/s)
176 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 135M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 108W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800 +1676%
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 135M
0.026 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro FX
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
594 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
9.504GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
2
192
Shading Units
16
64
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
25.60 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

108W
TDP
10W
300 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
G86
G200-835-B2
GPU Variant
G86-621-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy