Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 vs NVIDIA Tesla M2090

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 3800 and 6GB VRAM Tesla M2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 3800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (108W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla M2090 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 51.20GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 3800
0.462 TFLOPS
Tesla M2090 +188%
1.332 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2009
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
384bit
51.20GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
16
192
Shading Units
512
64
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

9.600 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

108W
TDP
250W
300 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GF110
G200-835-B2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
3 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy