Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 SDI and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
672 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 154W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600 SDI
0.23 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000 +676%
1.786 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2007
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
796 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
48
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
96 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
-
-
-
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS

Board Design

154W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
GM206
-
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Tesla
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy