Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI vs AMD Radeon Instinct MI250

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 SDI and 128GB VRAM Radeon Instinct MI250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 SDI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (154W vs 500W)
AMD Radeon Instinct MI250 's Advantages
Released 14 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1700MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (3277GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
13216 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600 SDI
0.23 TFLOPS
Radeon Instinct MI250 +19578%
45.26 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2007
Release Date
Nov 2021
Quadro FX
Generation
Radeon Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1700 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1600 MHz

Memory

768MB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
384bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
3277GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
208
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
13312
24
TMUs
832
24
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
96 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1414 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
362.1 TFLOPS
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
45.26 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
45.26 TFLOPS

Board Design

154W
TDP
500W
450 W
Suggested PSU
900 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
Aldebaran
-
GPU Variant
Aldebaran
Tesla
Architecture
CDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
6 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
58.2 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
N/A
3.3
OpenGL
N/A
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.0
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy