NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 vs NVIDIA Quadro K5200
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 768MB VRAM Quadro FX 4600 and 8GB VRAM Quadro K5200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4600 's Advantages
Lower TDP (134W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro K5200 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock771MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 768GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 67.20GB/s)
2208 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4600
0.23 TFLOPS
Quadro K5200
+1444%
3.553 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2007
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
Base Clock
667 MHz
-
Boost Clock
771 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz
Memory
768MB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
67.20GB/s
Bandwidth
192.3GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
12
SM Count
-
96
Shading Units
2304
24
TMUs
192
24
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
96 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
12.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.01 GPixel/s
24.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
148.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
230.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.553 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
148.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
134W
TDP
150W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI
2x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Processor
G80
GPU Name
GK110B
G80-850-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.0
CUDA
3.5
4.0
Shader Model
5.1
