NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro 400
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 512MB VRAM Quadro 400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 12.32GB/s)
144 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro 400 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Lower TDP (32W vs 150W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
+327%
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro 400
0.108 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Nov 2008
Release Date
Apr 2011
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
770 MHz
Memory
1536MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
12.32GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
24
SM Count
6
192
Shading Units
48
64
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
192 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.600 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
7.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
108.0 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
150W
TDP
32W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI
1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x DisplayPort
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GT200B
GPU Name
GT216
-
GPU Variant
GT216 GL
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.486 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²
Graphics Features
11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.2
4.0
Shader Model
4.1
