Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro M2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 4GB VRAM Quadro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro M2000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1163MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro M2000 +286%
1.786 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Apr 2016
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
796 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1163 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1653 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
105.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
48
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
37.22 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.82 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.786 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
55.82 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GM206
-
GPU Variant
GM206-875-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
2.94 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
228 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy