Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 256MB VRAM Quadro NVS 130M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (1536GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 11.20GB/s)
184 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro NVS 130M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition +3453%
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro NVS 130M
0.013 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
May 2007
Quadro FX
Generation
NVS Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
11.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
1
192
Shading Units
8
64
TMUs
8
24
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
192 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.600 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.80 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
10W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
G86
-
GPU Variant
G86-613-A2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
127 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy