Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition vs NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition and 6GB VRAM Quadro P3000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P3000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1215MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.3GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
1088 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro P3000 Mobile +573%
3.11 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jan 2017
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1088 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1215 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1753 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
168.3GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
10
192
Shading Units
1280
64
TMUs
80
24
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
1536 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
58.32 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
97.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
48.60 GFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.110 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
97.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GP104
-
GPU Variant
N17E-Q1-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
314 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy