Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 and 6GB VRAM Data Center GPU Flex 140 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

Intel Data Center GPU Flex 140 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1950MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (186.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800
0.462 TFLOPS
Data Center GPU Flex 140 +764%
3.994 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Aug 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Data Center GPU
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1600 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1950 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
96bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
186.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
-
-
-
192 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
124.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.987 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.994 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 2.0
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
DG2-128
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
-
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy