Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA Quadro P6000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 and 24GB VRAM Quadro P6000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Quadro P6000 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1645MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (432.8GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
3648 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro P6000 +2633%
12.63 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Oct 2016
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Pascal
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1506 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1645 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1127 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5X
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
432.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
30
192
Shading Units
3840
64
TMUs
240
24
ROPs
96
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
3 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
157.9 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
394.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
197.4 GFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.63 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
394.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
250W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI 4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GP102
-
GPU Variant
GP102-875-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
11.8 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
471 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy