Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 20.80GB/s)
160 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (42W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 +589%
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 1700 Mac Edition
0.067 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Sep 2008
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
20.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
4
192
Shading Units
32
64
TMUs
16
24
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
192 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.160 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
8.320 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
66.56 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
42W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
G84
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy