Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
144 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800 +263%
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
6
192
Shading Units
48
64
TMUs
24
24
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
192 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
G94
-
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
3.3
OpenGL
3.3
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
1.1
4.0
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy