Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA GRID M60 4A

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA GRID M60 4A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 and 4GB VRAM GRID M60 4A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID M60 4A 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1178MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
1856 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800
0.462 TFLOPS
GRID M60 4A +944%
4.825 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro FX
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
557 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1178 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
-
192
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
128
24
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
75.39 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
150.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.825 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
150.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
225W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GM204
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
5.2
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy