Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 and 6GB VRAM Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1380MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
1728 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (80W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800
0.462 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 3000 Mobile Refresh +1046%
5.299 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
945 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1380 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
192bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
336.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
30
192
Shading Units
1920
64
TMUs
120
24
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
240
-
RT Cores
30
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
88.32 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
165.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.60 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.299 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
165.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
80W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
TU106
-
GPU Variant
N19E-Q1-KD-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
12 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
10.8 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
445 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy