Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA RTX A5500

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA RTX A5500

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 and 24GB VRAM RTX A5500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 230W)
NVIDIA RTX A5500 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1665MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (768.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
10048 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800
0.462 TFLOPS
RTX A5500 +7280%
34.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Ampere
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1080 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1665 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
768.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
80
192
Shading Units
10240
64
TMUs
320
24
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
320
-
RT Cores
80
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
159.8 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
532.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
34.10 TFLOPS
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
34.10 TFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
532.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
230W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GA102
-
-
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
55 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
8.6
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy