Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 238W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 8 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 4800
0.462 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050 +122%
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro FX
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
384bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
24
SM Count
14
192
Shading Units
448
64
TMUs
56
24
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
192 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.45 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
38.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
462.3 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
57.79 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
238W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GF100
-
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.3
CUDA
2.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy