Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 5600 and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 13 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1536GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
2944 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (110W vs 171W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 5600
0.346 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh +2643%
9.492 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2007
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1035 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
48
128
Shading Units
3072
32
TMUs
192
24
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
96 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.98 TFLOPS
345.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.492 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
296.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

171W
TDP
110W
450 W
Suggested PSU
-
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
TU104B
G80-875-A2
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.0
CUDA
7.5
4.0
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy