Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 570M and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 570M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 70W)
NVIDIA RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1560MHz
More VRAM (20GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (280.0GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
6112 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 570M
0.061 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 SFF Ada Generation +31326%
19.17 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2007
Release Date
Mar 2023
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ada
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
720 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1560 MHz
700 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

512MB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
160bit
22.40GB/s
Bandwidth
280.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
4
SM Count
48
32
Shading Units
6144
16
TMUs
192
8
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
32 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.800 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
124.8 GPixel/s
7.600 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
299.5 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.17 TFLOPS
60.80 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.17 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
299.5 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
70W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G84
GPU Name
AD104
NB8P-GL
GPU Variant
-
Tesla
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
80 nm
Process Size
5 nm
0.289 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
169 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.1
CUDA
8.9
4.0
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy