Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

NVIDIA Quadro FX 5800 vs NVIDIA Quadro P2000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro FX 5800 and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro P2000 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (140.2GB/s vs 102.4GB/s)
784 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 189W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 5800
0.622 TFLOPS
Quadro P2000 +387%
3.031 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2008
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1076 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
5GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
512bit
Memory Bus
160bit
102.4GB/s
Bandwidth
140.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
30
SM Count
8
240
Shading Units
1024
80
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

19.52 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.20 GPixel/s
48.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
94.72 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
47.36 GFLOPS
622.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.031 TFLOPS
77.76 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
94.72 GFLOPS

Board Design

189W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT200B
GPU Name
GP106
-
GPU Variant
GP106-875-A1
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
55 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.4 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
470 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
CUDA
6.1
4.0
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy