Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M and 16GB VRAM Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 110W)
NVIDIA Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1545MHz
More VRAM (16GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
3024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
Quadro RTX 5000 Mobile Refresh +8082%
9.492 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Jun 2020
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1035 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1545 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
48
48
Shading Units
3072
16
TMUs
192
8
ROPs
64
-
Tensor Cores
384
-
RT Cores
48
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.88 GPixel/s
8.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
296.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
18.98 TFLOPS
116.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
9.492 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
296.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
110W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
TU104B
N10P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
13.6 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
545 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy