Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M and 4GB VRAM Quadro T2000 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 40W)
NVIDIA Quadro T2000 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1620MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.1GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
976 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
Quadro T2000 Max Q +2760%
3.318 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
May 2019
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1200 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1620 MHz
790 MHz
Memory Clock
1751 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
112.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
16
48
Shading Units
1024
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
51.84 GPixel/s
8.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.636 TFLOPS
116.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.318 TFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
103.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
40W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
TU117
N10P-GLM
GPU Variant
-
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
12 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
4.7 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.3
1.2
CUDA
7.5
4.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy