Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M vs NVIDIA Tesla C2050

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro FX 880M and 3GB VRAM Tesla C2050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 880M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 238W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2050 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.0GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
400 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 880M
0.116 TFLOPS
Tesla C2050 +786%
1.028 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2010
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro FX Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
790 MHz
Memory Clock
750 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
25.28GB/s
Bandwidth
144.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
6
SM Count
14
48
Shading Units
448
16
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
64 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

4.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.07 GPixel/s
8.800 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.14 GTexel/s
-
-
-
116.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1028 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
513.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
238W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GT216
GPU Name
GF100
N10P-GLM
GPU Variant
GF100-850-A3
Tesla 2.0
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
40 nm
Process Size
40 nm
0.486 billion
Transistors
3.1 billion
100 mm²
Die Size
529 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1
OpenCL
1.1
N/A
Vulkan
N/A
1.2
CUDA
2.0
4.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy