Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K1200 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 76.80GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (45W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200 +149%
1.151 TFLOPS
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1536MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
24
-
Compute Units
-
512
Shading Units
192
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
192 KB

Theoretical Performance

17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GT200B
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Board Design

45W
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy