NVIDIA Quadro K1200 vs NVIDIA Tesla C2090
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 4GB VRAM Quadro K1200 and 6GB VRAM Tesla C2090 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K1200 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1124MHz
Lower TDP (45W vs 250W)
NVIDIA Tesla C2090 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (177.4GB/s vs 80.00GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K1200
1.151 TFLOPS
Tesla C2090
+15%
1.332 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2015
Release Date
Jul 2011
Quadro
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1058 MHz
Base Clock
-
1124 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
924 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
80.00GB/s
Bandwidth
177.4GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
512
Shading Units
512
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
48
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
17.98 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
20.83 GPixel/s
35.97 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.66 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1151 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1332 GFLOPS
35.97 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
666.1 GFLOPS
Board Design
45W
TDP
250W
200 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GM107
GPU Name
GF110
GM107-860-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
3 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1
