Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs AMD Instinct MI300A

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs AMD Instinct MI300A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 128GB VRAM AMD Instinct MI300A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 760W)
AMD Instinct MI300A 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock2100MHz
More VRAM (128GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (5300GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
14208 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
AMD Instinct MI300A +16625%
122.6 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Dec 2023
Quadro
Generation
Instinct
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
2100 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
5200 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
128GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM3
128bit
Memory Bus
8192bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
5300GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
228
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
14592
32
TMUs
880
16
ROPs
0
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
256 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
0 MPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1496 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
980.6 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
122.6 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
61.3 TFLOPS

Board Design

51W
TDP
760W
250 W
Suggested PSU
1000 W
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
MI300
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
CDNA 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
146 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
1017 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy