Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 4GB VRAM RTX A2000 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (51W vs 95W)
NVIDIA RTX A2000 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1358MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
2176 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
RTX A2000 Mobile +848%
6.953 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
893 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1358 MHz
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
384
Shading Units
2560
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
65.18 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
108.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
6.953 TFLOPS
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
6.953 TFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
108.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

51W
TDP
95W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GA106
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
12 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
276 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy