Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5010M

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro 5010M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro 5010M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
Lower TDP (51W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro 5010M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (83.20GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000 +6%
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro 5010M
0.691 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
650 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
83.20GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
12
384
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.80 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

51W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GF110
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
N12E-Q5
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
520 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy