Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000 and 4GB VRAM Quadro K4000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
Lower TDP (51W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro K4000M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (89.60GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000
0.733 TFLOPS
Quadro K4000M +57%
1.154 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2013
Release Date
Jun 2012
Quadro
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 2.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
1000 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
64.00GB/s
Bandwidth
89.60GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
960
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

7.632 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.02 GPixel/s
30.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
48.08 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
732.7 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1154 GFLOPS
30.53 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
48.08 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GK104
GK107-301-A2
GPU Variant
N14E-Q3-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Board Design

51W
TDP
100W
250 W
Suggested PSU
-
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy