Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 vs NVIDIA Quadro K2000D

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 5600 and 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000D to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
NVIDIA Quadro K2000D 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1536GB)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (51W vs 171W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro FX 5600
0.346 TFLOPS
Quadro K2000D +111%
0.733 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2007
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro FX
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
PCIe 1.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

1536MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
76.80GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
128
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
32
24
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
96 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.40 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.632 GPixel/s
38.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
30.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
345.6 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
732.7 GFLOPS
-
FP64 (double)
30.53 GFLOPS

Board Design

171W
TDP
51W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x S-Video
Outputs
2x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

G80
GPU Name
GK107
G80-875-A2
GPU Variant
GK107-301-A2
Tesla
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
90 nm
Process Size
28 nm
0.681 billion
Transistors
1.27 billion
484 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

11.1 (10_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
3.3
OpenGL
4.6
1.1 (1.0)
OpenCL
3.0
N/A
Vulkan
1.1
1.0
CUDA
3.0
4.0
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy