Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Tesla K20c

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 5GB VRAM Tesla K20c to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 225W)
NVIDIA Tesla K20c 's Advantages
More VRAM (5GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (208.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2112 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Tesla K20c +516%
3.524 TFLOPS
OctaneBench
Quadro K2000M
12
Tesla K20c +358%
55
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Nov 2012
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1300 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
5GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
320bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
208.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
2496
32
TMUs
208
16
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.71 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
146.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.524 TFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1175 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GK110
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
GK110-885-KA-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
7.08 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
561 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.5
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy