Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA GRID K520Q

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA GRID K520Q

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 4GB VRAM GRID K520Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 225W)
NVIDIA GRID K520Q 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
GRID K520Q +300%
2.289 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jul 2014
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
1536
32
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.84 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
95.36 GTexel/s
-
-
-
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.289 TFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
95.36 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
225W
-
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GK104
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3.54 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy