Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 570

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 256MB VRAM Quadro FX 570 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 9 months late
Larger VRAM bandwidth (28.80GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
368 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA Quadro FX 570 's Advantages
Lower TDP (38W vs 55W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M +1872%
0.572 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 570
0.029 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Sep 2007
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
DDR3
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
16
32
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.680 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
3.680 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
29.44 GFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
G84
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.289 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
169 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
38W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy