Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro CX

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 1536MB VRAM Quadro CX to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1536GB)
192 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro CX 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M +23%
0.572 TFLOPS
Quadro CX
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro CX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1536MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
384
Shading Units
192
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GT200B
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy