Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro K4000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 3GB VRAM Quadro K4000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 80W)
NVIDIA Quadro K4000 's Advantages
Released 9 months late
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (134.8GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Quadro K4000 +117%
1.244 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Mar 2013
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1404 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
192bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
134.8GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
384
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
256 KB
L2 Cache
384 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
12.96 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
51.84 GTexel/s
-
-
-
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1244 GFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
51.84 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
80W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 2x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GK106
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Kepler
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.1
3.0
CUDA
3.0
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy