Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro M3000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 4GB VRAM Quadro M3000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro M3000M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.4GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Quadro M3000M +275%
2.15 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Aug 2015
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
-
-
Boost Clock
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
160.4GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SMM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
33.60 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
67.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.150 TFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GM204
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
N16E-Q1-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
5.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
398 mm²

Board Design

55W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
5.2
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy