Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P2200

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro P2200

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 5GB VRAM Quadro P2200 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (55W vs 75W)
NVIDIA Quadro P2200 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1493MHz
More VRAM (5GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (200.2GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
896 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
0.572 TFLOPS
Quadro P2200 +568%
3.822 TFLOPS
Blender
Quadro K2000M
35
Quadro P2200 +820%
322
OctaneBench
Quadro K2000M
12
Quadro P2200 +425%
63
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2012
Release Date
Jun 2019
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1000 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1493 MHz
900 MHz
Memory Clock
1251 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
5GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5X
128bit
Memory Bus
160bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
200.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
10
384
Shading Units
1280
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
40
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
1280 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.72 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
119.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
59.72 GFLOPS
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.822 TFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
119.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GP106
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
16 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
4.4 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy