NVIDIA Quadro K2000M vs NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 S4
We compared two Professional market GPUs: 2GB VRAM Quadro K2000M and 1536MB VRAM Quadro Plex 2100 S4 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA Quadro K2000M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 11 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1536GB)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (55W vs 640W)
NVIDIA Quadro Plex 2100 S4 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
Quadro K2000M
+65%
0.572 TFLOPS
Quadro Plex 2100 S4
0.346 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jun 2012
Release Date
Jul 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Plex
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
-
-
-
-
-
-
900 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
1536MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
28.80GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
16
384
Shading Units
128
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
256 KB
L2 Cache
96 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
5.960 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.40 GPixel/s
23.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
572.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
345.6 GFLOPS
23.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
55W
TDP
640W
-
Suggested PSU
1000 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-
Graphics Processor
GK107
GPU Name
G80
N14P-Q3-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.0
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
