Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA A10 PCIe

NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA A10 PCIe

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M and 24GB VRAM A10 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
NVIDIA A10 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1695MHz
More VRAM (24GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (600.2GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
9024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
A10 PCIe +9482%
31.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Apr 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
885 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1695 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1563 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
24GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
600.2GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
72
192
Shading Units
9216
16
TMUs
288
8
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
288
-
RT Cores
72
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
6 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
162.7 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
488.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.24 TFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.24 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
976.3 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GA102
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
GA102-890-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
28.3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
628 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy