Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M and 80GB VRAM A100 PCIe 80 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 300W)
NVIDIA A100 PCIe 80 GB 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1410MHz
More VRAM (80GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1.94TB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
6720 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
A100 PCIe 80 GB +5878%
19.49 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Jun 2021
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Tesla Ampere(Axx)
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1065 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1410 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1512 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
80GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
5120bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
1.94TB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
108
192
Shading Units
6912
16
TMUs
432
8
ROPs
160
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
80 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
225.6 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
609.1 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
77.97 TFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
19.49 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
9.746 TFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
300W
-
Suggested PSU
700 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GA100
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy