Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA GRID A100A

NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA GRID A100A

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M and 48GB VRAM GRID A100A to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 400W)
NVIDIA GRID A100A 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1005MHz
More VRAM (48GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (1866GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
6720 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
GRID A100A +4160%
13.89 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
May 2020
Quadro Mobile
Generation
GRID
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
900 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1005 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
48GB
DDR3
Memory Type
HBM2e
64bit
Memory Bus
6144bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
1866GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
108
192
Shading Units
6912
16
TMUs
432
8
ROPs
192
-
Tensor Cores
432
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
193.0 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
434.2 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
55.57 TFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.89 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
6.947 TFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
400W
-
Suggested PSU
800 W
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GA100
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy