Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB

NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M and 6GB VRAM RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 60W)
NVIDIA RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1140MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (132.0GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
2368 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
RTX A1000 Mobile 6 GB +1690%
5.837 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Mar 2022
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Ampere-M
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
652 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1140 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
6GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
96bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
132.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
192
Shading Units
2560
16
TMUs
80
8
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
36.48 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
91.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.837 TFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.837 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
91.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
60W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GA107
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.6
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy