Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA Quadro 4000M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M and 2GB VRAM Quadro 4000M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 100W)
NVIDIA Quadro 4000M 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.00GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
144 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro 4000M +95%
0.638 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Feb 2011
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
625 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
80.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
7
192
Shading Units
336
16
TMUs
56
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.650 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
26.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
638.4 GFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
53.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
100W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GF104
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
N12E-Q3-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Fermi
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.95 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
332 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
2.1
5.1
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy