Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M and 512MB VRAM Quadro FX 2700M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
More VRAM (1024GB vs 512GB)
144 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 65W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 2700M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.14GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K200M +156%
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 2700M
0.127 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Aug 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-HE

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
512MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
192
Shading Units
48
16
TMUs
24
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.480 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.72 GTexel/s
-
-
-
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
127.2 GFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
65W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
G94
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
NB9E-GLM2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
0.505 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
240 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.1
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy