Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M and 1536MB VRAM Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)
NVIDIA Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (1536GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (76.80GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro FX 4800 Mac Edition +41%
0.462 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Nov 2008
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro FX
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
-
-
-
-
-
800 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
1536MB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
384bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
76.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
192
Shading Units
192
16
TMUs
64
8
ROPs
24
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
128 KB
L2 Cache
192 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.45 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.53 GTexel/s
-
-
-
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
462.3 GFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
57.79 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
150W
-
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GT200B
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2025 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy