Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000

NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA Quadro P1000

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M and 4GB VRAM Quadro P1000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 47W)
NVIDIA Quadro P1000 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1480MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro P1000 +480%
1.894 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Feb 2017
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1266 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1480 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1253 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
80.19GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
5
192
Shading Units
640
16
TMUs
40
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
47.36 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
59.20 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.60 GFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.894 TFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.20 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
47W
-
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GP107
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
GP107-860-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy