Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA Quadro P620 Mobile

NVIDIA Quadro K200M vs NVIDIA Quadro P620 Mobile

We compared two Professional market GPUs: 1024MB VRAM Quadro K200M and 4GB VRAM Quadro P620 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA Quadro K200M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 40W)
NVIDIA Quadro P620 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1443MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.13GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
320 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
Quadro K200M
0.326 TFLOPS
Quadro P620 Mobile +353%
1.478 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2014
Release Date
Feb 2018
Quadro Mobile
Generation
Quadro Mobile
Professional
Type
Professional
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

-
Base Clock
1177 MHz
-
Boost Clock
1443 MHz
800 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
4GB
DDR3
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
12.80GB/s
Bandwidth
96.13GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
4
192
Shading Units
512
16
TMUs
32
8
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
128 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

3.400 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.09 GPixel/s
13.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.18 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
23.09 GFLOPS
326.4 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1478 GFLOPS
13.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
46.18 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
40W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK107
GPU Name
GP107
N14M-Q1
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.27 billion
Transistors
3.3 billion
118 mm²
Die Size
132 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy